The IAA Transportation 2024 is over and has provided exciting insights into the future of alternative drive systems for trucks. A key issue was the reduction of operating costs, which are crucial in the commercial vehicle sector. At the same time, the focus was on strategies for reducing CO₂ emissions through alternative drive technologies. Leading truck manufacturers presented their plans and technologies for the future of freight transport.
Strategies of truck manufacturers
The various manufacturers rely on different technologies to meet the requirements of the future:
Daimler Truck presented its all-electric truck at the IAA, which is already ready for series production and is suitable for urban delivery traffic as well as medium distances. Daimler is also investing in hydrogen drives for long distances, as they are seen as an alternative energy source to diesel in the future.
Volvo Trucks is also focusing heavily on electrification and has unveiled a whole range of battery-electric trucks. Volvo sees electrification as the way to achieve stricter CO₂ emission targets. Hydrogen technologies are being developed in parallel, especially for heavier transports over long distances.
MAN Truck & Bus focuses on electrification and underlined at the IAA that electric drives are the most promising path for it. In addition, investments are being made in fuel cells and synthetic fuels.
Operating costs: Conventional vs. alternative drives
Operating costs are crucial for the competitiveness of truck fleets. Electric drives score with lower energy costs and lower maintenance costs, as they have fewer moving parts than conventional diesel drives. However, the acquisition costs for e-trucks are still high, which deters many operators. In comparison, operating costs for diesel trucks are more expensive due to maintenance and rising fuel prices, but remain cheaper to buy.
The main cost drivers for alternative drives are:
· Batteries: The production and development of high-performance batteries is expensive. Battery life affects the total cost of ownership.
· Infrastructure: The charging infrastructure for electric trucks has not yet been expanded nationwide, which leads to higher investment costs.
· Hydrogen: Fuel cell vehicles have high manufacturing costs and the hydrogen infrastructure is still in its infancy.
But that will change in the future. Rising fuel prices and CO2 taxation are clear reasons for this. The cost of alternative drives will also fall considerably, making them much more attractive. With increasing acceptance, availability, expansion of infrastructure increases, and at the same time the acquisition costs and costs for alternative fuels such as H2 or energy fall.
CO₂ limits and legal framework
Stricter legal CO₂ limits are forcing manufacturers to innovate. The EU has decided that CO₂ emissions from trucks must be reduced by at least 30% by 2030. As a result, alternative drives such as electrification and hydrogen are being massively promoted. Manufacturers and fleet operators must invest in these technologies in order to remain competitive in the long term.
Synthetic fuels
Synthetic fuels, also known as e-fuels, are becoming increasingly important in the discussion about alternative drives. They are made from hydrogen and CO₂ produced from renewable sources, which makes them potentially climate-neutral. In the field of truck powertrains, they could play an important role in the future, as they are compatible with existing combustion engines and would not require large investments in new drive technologies or infrastructure.
At present, synthetic fuels are not yet of great market importance. Most of them are in the development phase or in smaller pilot projects. Their production has so far been very cost-intensive, as it requires energy-intensive processes and manufacturing capacities have not yet been sufficiently scaled. Nevertheless, they are seen as an important transitional technology, especially for hard-to-electrify sectors such as long-distance transport or special applications such as construction and mining vehicles.
Future significance and opportunities
In the future, synthetic fuels could play a significant role, especially as a complement to battery-electric and hydrogen-based drives. Their ability to be used in existing fleets and with existing infrastructure is a major advantage. This could offer fleet operators the opportunity to gradually switch to climate-neutral fuels without having to replace their entire fleet.
Climate neutrality: If synthetic fuels are produced with green electricity, they could be almost climate-neutral, as they only release as much CO₂ as was sequestered during their production.
Compatibility with existing engines: Unlike hydrogen and electric powertrains, synthetic fuels can be used in today's diesel or gasoline engines. This makes them attractive for a short-term solution without the need for expensive conversions.
Flexibility: Synthetic fuels could also serve as a backup solution for areas where electrification or hydrogen infrastructure is not yet developed.
Cost impact and challenges
The biggest challenges with synthetic fuels are currently the high production costs. These result mainly from:
Energy-intensive manufacturing: Converting hydrogen and CO₂ into liquid fuels requires enormous amounts of energy, which should ideally come from renewable sources. This leads to high costs as long as renewable energies are still relatively expensive.
Lack of mass production: Currently, there are no large production facilities for synthetic fuels, which keeps prices high. However, as production capacity ramps up, costs could fall over the next few years, similar to what has been the case with batteries and solar power.
Political framework: The promotion of synthetic fuels depends heavily on political decisions. To make them competitive, subsidies or tax incentives may need to be introduced. So far, however, there is a lack of clear global standards or an international market for e-fuels.
Potential risks and disadvantages
High energy requirements: Even with widespread use of renewable energies, the energy efficiency of synthetic fuels remains a problem compared to electric drives. Much more energy is needed to produce e-fuels than to directly supply electrically powered trucks.
Long-term competitiveness: With falling costs for battery technologies and the expansion of hydrogen infrastructure, synthetic fuels could only be a temporary solution and less economically attractive in the long term.
Synthetic fuels have the potential to play an important role in the decarbonisation of truck transport, especially in areas where other technologies are difficult to implement. In the long term, however, they could be replaced by cheaper and more efficient alternatives such as battery-electric drives and hydrogen. The development and dissemination of synthetic fuels depends heavily on technological advances and political frameworks. Fleet operators who want to rely on e-fuels today must expect high costs, but could benefit from government subsidies and future economies of scale.
Comparison of operating costs for trucks
The comparison of operating costs for trucks with diesel, synthetic fuels, batteries and hydrogen shows the evolution of costs per kilometre for the different drive types today (2024) and in the future (2030 and 2040).
In the case of diesel, we are seeing slightly rising costs due to higher fuel prices and CO₂ emission targets. In the case of synthetic fuels, however, the high initial costs can decrease with increasing production and economies of scale. In the future, battery-powered vehicles will benefit significantly from falling costs due to technological advances and lower energy costs. As with synthetic fuels, hydrogen is expected to incur high costs at the beginning, which will fall in the long term due to infrastructure and production expansions.
Opinion of truck fleet operators and associations
The opinions of fleet operators are mixed. Many welcome the introduction of alternative propulsion systems, but express concerns about the higher acquisition costs and the still inadequate charging and refuelling infrastructure. Associations such as the Federal Association of Road Haulage, Logistics and Disposal (BGL) are calling for greater state support for the development of the necessary infrastructure.
Forecasts
The forecasts for the registration figures for alternative drive systems are promising. While diesel trucks will slowly decline in the next few years, the share of electric and hydrogen-powered trucks will increase continuously.
In summary, the IAA Transportation 2024 shows that electrification and hydrogen propulsion will dominate the future of freight transport. Cost reduction, legal requirements and technological advances will have a decisive influence on development.
Comments